clean-retina
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/sawpub/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114And now it\u2019s time for SAW Publishing to review SAW Publishing\u2019s Review System!<\/p>\n
Conflict of interest? Totally. Still somewhat valuable? We can at least hope so.<\/p>\n
In fact, it has been over a year since we launched our new 100-point grading system, and as promised I am coming back to take a look at how it\u2019s working after fifteen months and 30+ reviews.<\/p>\n
1) The expanded number of points<\/em><\/strong> in the new grading system puts a bit more emphasis on pros, and a bit less emphasis on red flags.<\/p>\n 2) The 100-point concept makes it super easy to convert reviews to a percentage grade<\/em><\/strong>. The percentage grade, in it\u2019s turn, allows easy comparison between reviews.<\/p>\n 3) Building the system around ten core categories <\/em><\/strong>lets me focus on a book\u2019s strength and weaknesses in each area, instead of just giving an \u201coverall impression\u201d grade.<\/p>\n 4) Using precise definitions<\/em><\/strong> for the \u201cscale of one to ten\u201d mean that numbers are less of a stab in the dark.<\/p>\n 5) Systems give me energy\u2014so having a review system gives me a bit of motivation<\/em><\/strong> to review a book!<\/p>\n 1) The in-depth approach of SAW Publishing review system is unquestionably time consuming<\/strong><\/em>. (I know I would review a greater number of books per year if I could do it more quickly.)<\/p>\n 2) While red flags<\/strong><\/em> dominate the review less than under the old system, they can still end up taking a prominent role.<\/p>\n 3) The review template is a little bulky<\/strong><\/em>! (I basically need to either read with my computer within reach, or print a double-sided review sheet for each book.)<\/p>\n 4) Using the percentage grades to compare between age ranges\/widely-differing-genres<\/strong><\/em> can be difficult.<\/p>\n 5) I, personally, hate making decisions<\/strong><\/em>! (And a review system, by definition, is a decision-making field day.)<\/p>\n The only thing I seriously regret about the past year of reviews, is that I think, in our unfamiliarity with the tool, we gravitated towards grades that were consistently five to ten points too low.<\/p>\n How good is really good? How great is really great?<\/p>\n They are subjective questions that we are trying to answer in an objective way. In the desire to give the most conscientious review possible, I think the SAW Publishing staff (who are the essence of conservative, in the broadest and purest sense of the word!) erred a little on the side of caution. 60% grades could possibly have been 70%\u201470% could have been 80%\u2014and so on, up the scale.<\/p>\n Obviously, no system is perfect, but with the experience of the past thirty-some books behind me, I think I would probably have boosted most of the middle-to-high percentage grades a little if I were doing them over again.<\/p>\n Yes! We totally will!<\/p>\n SAW Publishing\u2019s review system will continue to be our evaluation tool (Lord willing) going forward. In fact, we already have some reviews waiting in the wings for their turn in 2022.<\/p>\n The 100-point grading format can be used for much more than books. In fact, our templates for novels and non-fic grew out of our original poetry-grading worksheet in the first place. If you are interested in using this tool to grade any form of literature\u2014as well as a detailed explanation of how the review system works\u2014see our previous post:<\/p>\n5 Things I DON\u2019T Love<\/strong><\/h5>\n
My One Serious Regret<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Will We be Using SAW Publishing\u2019s Review System Another Year?<\/strong><\/h5>\n