clean-retina
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/sawpub/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114As a child, I used to get laughed at for trying to sound grown-up. One of the phrases I considered effective was \u201cage-appropriate.\u201d I applied it to literature. To Beatrix Potter in particular. Beatrix Potter in my opinion (or in the opinion of some adult I was quoting??) was not age-appropriate for little girls of three. (My sister was three.) It was<\/em> age-appropriate for big girls of five. (I was five.)<\/p>\n It was not until some years later that I really comprehended the humour of all this.<\/p>\n My grandmother has a beautiful collection of Beatrix Potter books, but I am afraid I have never been able to wholly divest myself of my early impressions\u2014because I still feel like they are \u201cage-appropriate\u201d to a more mature audience than the little children for whom they were originally written.<\/p>\n Occasionally in a novel (or maybe in real life, too!) you meet with a character who was raised with free access to a large grown-up library. It is usually portrayed as having a good effect on their mental and emotional development. These \u201cbookish\u201d characters tend to have a more mature outlook, a stronger imagination, and greater depth of character than those who spend their time romping outdoors or internalizing nothing but fairy tales and \u201cMcGuffey\u2019s Eclectic.\u201d<\/p>\n I have to admit, I identify with these bookworm characters. I think they are justly portrayed as being more mature, imaginative, and multi-faceted as a direct result of the wide range of literature they have devoured. On the flip side of the question, would it also be fair to portray a certain amount of mental, emotional, or spiritual trauma as an equally direct result of reading these same books?<\/p>\n If both of these statements are true, then what are we to make of the dilemma in which they place us?<\/p>\n I think the most effective way of facing this problem\u2014regardless of which \u201cage\u201d category each of us fits into\u2014is to draw a distinction between age-appropriate language and age-appropriate content.<\/p>\n Most bookworms develop language-comprehension-skills that are significantly ahead of their actual age. As this process continues, increasingly complex language becomes age-appropriate. Age-appropriate language may very fittingly expand as fast as the reader\u2019s comprehension can keep pace. Age-appropriate content, on the other hand, is a little more fixed\u2014or perhaps we had better say, it is as unique as the individual, but it does NOT expand at a rate that is tied to language comprehension.<\/p>\n In my opinion, readers who already love books derive very little harm from reading books with language<\/em> that is far beyond anything \u201cappropriate\u201d to their age\u2014as long as the content<\/em> is still age-appropriate.<\/p>\n The whole reason I began thinking about this topic this week, is that I happen to be reading a children\u2019s book right now\u2014a pretty widely-read classic\u2014that gives an irresistibly humorous picture of two very spoiled young people. To an adult (who we hope isn\u2019t tempted to behave like a spoiled child!) this aspect of the story is perfectly age-appropriate\u2014and funny! To a child, depending on circumstances, it might be an unhelpful example.<\/p>\n And this is why I want to draw a distinct line between books that are not appropriate for some audiences, and books that are NEVER appropriate for any audiences. I really believe there are plenty of books in both of these classes.<\/p>\n The finally test, after all, is the impact a story is having on your own soul. Don\u2019t forbid yourself harmless reading because it wouldn\u2019t be age-appropriate for someone else. Don\u2019t excuse yourself for reading harmful books by saying \u201cyou\u2019re an adult\u201d (or a teenager, or a five-year-old, or whatever \u201cmature\u201d means in your life right now!) Have the courage to choose the books that are age-appropriate for you!<\/p>\n Oh, who decided that a blog post is supposed to be short! I feel like we\u2019ve barely scratched the surface on this topic.<\/p>\n Is reading too far below your language-level just as wasteful as reading too far above it? Is reading below your content-level just as unhelpful as exposing yourself to things you aren\u2019t ready for? Is your own soul the only thing you need to consider in choosing a book? What about the people who see you reading it? Or the family member who picks it up once it\u2019s in your house?<\/p>\n One thing I am pretty thoroughly convinced of. Christians need more age-appropriate books for every age. We need a generation who is passionate about good and great books!<\/p>\n Do you want to hear the most controversial opinion SAW Publishing ever voiced on this subject? See our previous post:<\/p>\nDoes Age-Appropriate Really Matter?<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Age-Appropriate Language vs. Age-Appropriate Content<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Age-Appropriate vs. NEVER-Appropriate<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Christians Need More Age-Appropriate Books!<\/strong><\/h5>\n